I think we lost the gun show on county property battle, but won the war.
As someone who has residences in both CA and OR, I live in the 9th circuit, and now start to wonder about how this will be applied.
Hopefully, the first to go will be CA's onerous gun storage requirements, clearly illegal by comparison with Heller.
Then we get to the CCW question. Both CA and OR refuse to accept out-of-state permits. How does this fly with the "full faith and credit" clause?
CA has outlawed .50 cal rifles, are they now legal?
Overall a wonderful decision.
Are all states in the 9th are now bound by the decision, no waiting for incorporation from the Supremes, or do they have some way around that?
All good questions.
I think you are right that you lost the battle but won the war. And the battle can still be waged if they lock down the guns at the shows actually. It can be challenged.
This would not apply to gun storage, if anything it will hurt accessibility because that is why they closed the loophole on the shows. It allowed access to anyone by the nature of it from what i gather.
crossing state lines again, will not be changed by this. Because each state will have to do it’s own regulation. But the fact is that they can not regulate them away entirely because of this decision as Obama would be trying very soon.
Again, the question of the .60 or any other cal is probably going to be left up to the state to regulate, but can be challenged directly.
It is law, they can not get around it at all now.
I don;t think that there are any immediate gains, but considering how Obama wants to disarm all of us and I believe he does. This seriously puts a damper on his plans.