Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Turnout will drive PA 2010 Senate race
Townhall.com ^ | April 19, 2009 | Salena Zito

Posted on 04/19/2009 11:54:53 AM PDT by Kaslin

As with anything involving Pennsylvania politics, it’s complicated.

Much of Pennsylvania’s 2010 U.S. Senate race will depend on turnout in the primary and general elections.

Sounds obvious, right? Yet in an odd turn of political and geographical shifts, the Senate candidates will have little control over the outcome.

That is largely because of fiercely competitive primary races on both sides – for Republicans, incumbent Arlen Specter versus former U.S. Rep. Pat Toomey; for Democrats, state Rep. Josh Shapiro versus former Philadelphia deputy mayor Joe Torsella.

In the middle, all of the traditional party organizations will concentrate more of their money and most of their bodies on the governor’s race.

An increased turnout will help Specter in the primary. Yet his voters need one really important thing: motivation to show up at the polls. The governor’s race just might be that motivation.

Toomey’s voters will come out, no matter what. Yet to win, Toomey needs to run a solid campaign with an adult at the helm dictating strategy, not ideology.

Governor's races are defined by the personality of the candidates; voters want to like, know and trust the person who is their governor.

Issues, however, drive federal legislative races.

That helps Specter in a general election but hurts him big-time in the primary. He is seen by the general electorate as a moderate who is not driven by ideology, which is why he was comfortable flip-flopping on the union card-check issue for the short term.

The four clear, credible candidates for the U.S. Senate, in a nutshell:

Specter: A known commodity and the state’s most dominant political figure over the past 30 years. Others have come and gone, but with a lot of luck in many close elections, Arlen remains. People don't love him, but many grudgingly respect his seniority. His vulnerability is spending – and if the primary and general races are defined by earmarks and Washington’s culture of corruption, he’s in big, big trouble: He is a master of inside-politics, willing to spend, and never has been in the lower-taxes, smaller-government crowd.

Toomey: A credible, younger challenger with a clear message on earmarks and spending. However, he is not a great orator and has not proven himself able to motivate people beyond the front-bench believers who are with him because he isn't Arlen.

Think of a packed church on Easter Sunday, when everyone in the congregation sees themselves as “saints”:

Those up front are there every week for every service; Toomey has already captured them because he isn't Arlen.

Those in the mid-pews are excited to learn more about the guy, but Toomey has not yet convinced them. (This is the key to his poor performance in Central Pennsylvania's conservative “T” when he ran against Specter in 2004; he needs them to win, and they want to follow him – but they need a reason.)

Those in the back pew are only there because it’s a holiday; they’ll vote in 2010, and Arlen has their votes because he’s the known commodity.

Shapiro: Clearly an overall good candidate, he appeals to Arlen's base for money and votes and could be seen as a newer model at a time when voters are looking for a trade-in. He appears to have only one problem: He’s a member of the Pennsylvania House, the absolutely worst recruiting spot right now. But Shapiro has done a good job of defining himself as a reformer and an outsider in the statehouse culture of never-ending corruption.

Torsella: A proven fundraiser, known in the Philly establishment as an all-around good guy, but he ran a lackluster, mismanaged congressional primary against Rep. Allison Schwartz that he should have won. At this point, it’s hard to see him beating Shapiro.

One wildcard is State Auditor General Jack Wagner, the only Democrat who won more Pennsylvania votes than Barack Obama in November 2008. Wagner getting into this race is plausible, but the smart money still is on Shapiro.

Can any of these potential challengers take out Arlen with an anti-spending, anti-corruption message? Will the stimulus vote be a plus or a minus for Arlen? How much will Obama help the primary-winning Democrat, since Specter has handed him several key votes in the U.S. Senate?

All of these unknowns will make this 2010 race of particular national interest.


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 111th; 2010; acorn; pennsylvania; rendell; specter; tooomey; zito

1 posted on 04/19/2009 11:54:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Who was the Brilliant mind that thought up that headline.

Mr Obvious strikes again.

2 posted on 04/19/2009 11:56:22 AM PDT by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It is GOOD that the Dems have a hot primary.

That keeps the Dems at HOME, in their own Party, rather than crossing over to vote for Arlen!

3 posted on 04/19/2009 11:57:50 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why aren’t PA conservatives playing up the Rendell/pay to sue scandal? This really needs to some attention because it goes to the heart of the Democrat Party. Dirty money defines the Democrat Party.


4 posted on 04/19/2009 12:29:36 PM PDT by Eva (union motto - Aim for mediocrity, it's only fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
No mention on Specter’s age. The guy should have retired long ago.

Zito writes like a good turnout in the primary is good for Specter. A large turnout in the primary may put a challenger in the general election if the conservative base is inspired to vote for a challenger.

5 posted on 04/19/2009 12:47:30 PM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Why aren’t PA conservatives playing up the Rendell/pay to sue scandal?

Dirty money defines the Democrat Party.

I think you answered your own question.

News papers and TV news do not report much on Democrat scandals.

Number one it is a dog bites man story. No one is surprised.

Number two the Republicans can’t get reporters to investigate a Democrat scandal because the reporters aren’t their friends the reporters are the Democrats friends.

6 posted on 04/19/2009 12:52:45 PM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Stiil waiting on my reply to the email I sent Cornyn about supporting Specter. Will let you guys and gals know what he says.


7 posted on 04/19/2009 1:03:53 PM PDT by longhorn too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longhorn too

Yes, John Cornyn believes in Arlen Specter, but does Arlen Specter believe in John Cornyn? Only John knowns.


8 posted on 04/19/2009 2:37:27 PM PDT by Theodore R. (GWB is gone: Now the American sheeple can sleep at night!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think this is Obvious in this thread: DONATE to Pat Toomey!


9 posted on 04/19/2009 3:22:05 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Obama yo 'mama', Uncle Sam yo 'baby daddy'!; (The new cry of the Obama generation)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Must we have a campaign this soon?

It only serves to annoy the voters.


10 posted on 04/19/2009 3:23:09 PM PDT by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
All very interesting, but ACORN trumps all this stuff.

You have to figure that 20-30 thousand ACORN nuts will be on our payroll (see the stimulous bill) and be setting up residence in PA over the next year.

Added to that is the demoncruds superior ability to manufacture votes in any contested recount. (When have they ever lost, recently?)

11 posted on 04/19/2009 4:11:54 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal
(When have they ever lost, recently?)

Florida, 2000. They tried -- mightily -- but they failed.

Had the governor been a Democrat, there's little question that Algore would've been President.

12 posted on 04/19/2009 4:34:38 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAItNSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"Florida, 2000. They tried -- mightily -- but they failed. "

Yep! How could I have forgotten that? {;-(

Sigh......When you get to be my age, "recently" sometimes only includes the last 3-days....{:-)

13 posted on 04/20/2009 9:38:46 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson