Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: broken_arrow1

The poll is asking the wrong question. The right question is whether or not Texas has the right to secede. A good followup question would be whether or not the necessary conditions justifying succession are close to being satisfied.


44 posted on 04/17/2009 9:51:42 AM PDT by sourcery (Obama Lied. The Economy Died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery

The U.S. Constitution does not expressly recognize or deny a right of secession. Accordingly, the argument for a right of unilateral secession begins (and pretty much ends) with a claim about the very nature of the Constitution.

That document, by the terms of its Article VII, only obtained legal force through the ratification by nine states, and then only in the states so ratifying it. Because the Constitution derived its initial force from the voluntary act of consent by the sovereign states, secessionists argued, a state could voluntarily and unilaterally withdraw its consent from the Union.

In this view, the Constitution is a kind of multilateral treaty, which derives its legal effect from the consent of the sovereign parties to it. Just as sovereign nations can withdraw from a treaty, so too can the sovereign states withdraw from the Union.


45 posted on 04/17/2009 10:09:08 AM PDT by RED SOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson