Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POLL: 75% OF TEXANS WOULD VOTE TO STAY IN USA(Total BS poll)
rasmussen ^ | 4/17/2009

Posted on 04/17/2009 6:47:42 AM PDT by bestintxas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last
To: Doe Eyes
"Very convincing...No way the poll could be accurate if they didn't ask you."

BWHAAAAAAA!!!

Funny stuff, thanks.
I really needed some wry humor this day. ;^)

61 posted on 04/17/2009 7:38:06 AM PDT by Landru (Arghh, Liberals are trapped in my colon like spackle or paste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
If they don't want to seceed and have to leave TX, they sure wouldn't want to go to the next-best state.

They should have to go back to New Orleans!

62 posted on 04/17/2009 7:38:26 AM PDT by lonestar (Obama is turning Bush's "mess" into a catastrophe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: floridagopvoter

You said — If we are trying to get back into the majority anytime soon this talk of secession is not helping at all. It makes us look like the sorest of losers and no better than libs who “threatened” to leave the country for Canada if Bush does not end the Iraq war (of course none of them left.)

It is kind of crazy... all that happens is a lot of people get sidetracked on issues that will never go anywhere — with them thinking, all the while, that they’re “doing something”.

I can think of another crazy issue that has a dedicated following and they “think” they are “doing something”... It’s the small segment of Freepers who think that they are going to get a court case that kicks Obama out of the Office of President of the United States because of him not being qualified, per the Constitution, for the Office of President of the United States.

Now, I might have a definite “question” there, that hasn’t been answered, but I know a *definite* and *positive* way this is going to be solved and it’s not the way of the courts, which have repeatedly failed to gain any traction at all.

The method that will work is for states to pass legislation requiring documentation or the candidate can’t get on the ballot. Since I’m in Oklahoma, too..., I know of the bill going through the legislature in Oklahoma regarding that. They’re getting that ready to pass so that Obama will be required to show documentation.

There are losing ways to get something done, and then there are successful ways to get something done. At least Oklahoma has picked a winning way to get something done.

Apparently there are *some Texans* who would like to pick a “losing way” to get something done (i.e., “secession”).... :-)


63 posted on 04/17/2009 7:39:39 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

Oh.., I don’t know about that, I’m in both states, as it is now... :-)


64 posted on 04/17/2009 7:40:29 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

75% of Texans believe we should stay in MEXICO


65 posted on 04/17/2009 7:41:33 AM PDT by Lexington Green (I hope he fails...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

I think that any state or the combined states succeed much better in unity than they do in division...

And I think that the founding fathers created this “union” to stay together. Furthermore, Lincoln thought so much of the “union” that he fought the bloodiest war of our entire country’s history to “preserve the union”...

So, I’m with preserving the union...


66 posted on 04/17/2009 7:42:36 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: trisham

“Visit my brother in law in Corpus Christi. He’s as liberal as they come.”

As Rush used to say, we need to keep a few libs like Ted Kennedy around just to remind us why we don’t want to go there.


67 posted on 04/17/2009 7:47:44 AM PDT by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Not snowcapped year round, but definitely rugged.

http://www.stateparks.com/guadalupe_mountains_photography.html


68 posted on 04/17/2009 7:50:28 AM PDT by bestintxas (It's great in Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

I wanna go someone place *more* free than MD, not *less*....:))


69 posted on 04/17/2009 7:50:29 AM PDT by Salamander (Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: armymarinemom

I think it’s significant too.


70 posted on 04/17/2009 7:50:35 AM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas
Or allow them to be the designated driver.
71 posted on 04/17/2009 7:50:49 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: trisham
I got news for you. You would have gotten similar numbers in South Carolina in 1857. Coffee takes a while to percolate.
72 posted on 04/17/2009 7:53:26 AM PDT by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

More than a few Texan don’t think much of Lincoln or his darker predisessor.

“In When in the Course of Human Events, he argues that the war had nothing to do with slavery or union. Rather, it was entirely about tariffs, which the South hated. The tariff not only drove up the price of the manufactured goods that agrarian Southerners bought, it invited other countries to enact their own levies on Southern cotton. In this telling, Lincoln, and the North, wanted more than anything to raise tariffs, both to support a public works agenda and to protect Northern goods from competition with imports.”

http://www.reason.com/news/show/28132.html

Situation sound familiar?


73 posted on 04/17/2009 7:53:56 AM PDT by wolfcreek ("unnamed "right-wing extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

25% is a HUGE number considering talk of secession is relatively new, and the last time states discussed secession led to a bloody war.

By 2010 that number will probably hit the mid-40s.


74 posted on 04/17/2009 7:54:20 AM PDT by rom (Obama '12 slogan: Let's keep on hopin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: floridagopvoter
“It makes us look like the sorest of losers and no better than libs”

Yep, quite childish. I don't recall any blue state politicians talking secession or sovereignty under Bush. Now that the party is over and the bill is on the table look who's heading for the door.

75 posted on 04/17/2009 7:54:56 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
[ Maybe most conservatives aren’t quite ready to give up this soon. ]

Most conservatives have been and are oblivious.. even NOW..
Conservatives are mostly cowards.. and Bushbots..

Thats HOW the left has taken over academia, the media and Washington D.C... Voter fraud has been massive for decades.. Conservatives whine but DO NOTHING..

76 posted on 04/17/2009 7:56:18 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas
Wow.

They're a lot different from what I'm used to.


77 posted on 04/17/2009 7:56:47 AM PDT by Salamander (Like acid and oil on a madman's face, reason tends to fly away.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Sorry guy, but no way would I ever vote to betray my country and leave the union. I know that I’m easily in the majority. There is no movement afoot in Texas to secede outside of the usual suspects who’ve long since been card carrying whack-jobs.

I'll check back with you in about four years, the bottom of a federal boot gets old.

78 posted on 04/17/2009 7:57:47 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

It’s only natural that many did not think very well of Lincoln, considering that he fought a war... and ended up winning the war... :-)

It’s my opinion that each of the “states” of the 13 original states with our founding fathers could have each gone their own way, since they were sovereign states in their own right, anyway. But, the founding fathers put together a union and one that they intended would stay together.

And then Lincoln fought the war to “preserve the union” and no war has been bloodier (of all the wars we’ve had) than this one to preserve the union.

So, I would say that the *formation* of the union and then the “preservation* of the union — all argues against “secession”...


79 posted on 04/17/2009 7:58:42 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Melas

“...no way would I ever vote to betray my country...”
Your country has already betrayed you. If the people now running the country have their way and out carry the traditional Communist solution you will be either dead or possibly “re-educated”. Get it?
Is your loyalty to the Federal Government or to the American Nation?


80 posted on 04/17/2009 8:00:10 AM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis "Ya gotta saddle up your boys; Ya gotta draw a hard line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson