Posted on 04/14/2009 5:46:54 PM PDT by CalifScreaming
It could, but remember that apportionment of the House seats is being done through the federal census of 2010, and unfortunately, the 'Rats are in control of that. So these numbers in the posted article are only speculation.
If the bill now pending to expand the House from 435 saeats to 437 seats is signed into law, then one more state would gain a seat, and the District of Columbia would get its first voting seat.
That's if such a flagrantly unconstitutional law is not struck down by the judiciary. DC is not a state and is not entitled to representation in the House. But then again, if the federal bench is unwilling to tackle the Obama constitutional eligibility issue, it's doubtful that they would have any concern for the preservation of the Constitution at all.
Let’s hope that ACORN does not screw around with this.
Net pick up of 5 in solid red states. Wouldn’t have helped last year, though.
“Eight states are expected to lose one seat each, in the U.S. House and in the Electoral College. They are Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.”
The funny thing is all of those states are poster children for failed progressive policies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.