[Non-Sequitur]

“The judge’s ruling in the case that only Congress and only on Jan. 6 of each year following a presidential election can object as to whether the nominee is eligible to serve as president of the United States is, in our opinion, completely wrong and eviscerates the [Constitutional] requirements for serving as president in the United States Constitution,”

So the judge rules against him and he disagrees. Surprise, surprise.

[EternalVigilance]

We’re not surprised. Not in the least. This ruling was completely expected. However, to those who have actually read the ruling and know the facts and the history of ballot issues similar to this one in California, the decision is laughable.