I think bashing Obama without having the facts on-hand is counterproductive.
~~~
We bash because 0’s past affiliations, statements and government actions warrant it ... even in just his actions since 1/20/09; therefore, there is a basis of some knowledge of the proclivities and ideology of the subject official.
Do you disagree with the criteria ?
~~~~~~~~~
This is the kind of leader we’re saddled with now.
###
Obama’s Potemkin Military Reception=No Scandal-..were pre-screened,asked ...“Who voted for Obama?”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2227558/posts
*snip*
According to a sergeant in Iraq :
*****We were pre-screened, asked by officials “Who voted for Obama?”, and then those who raised their hands were shuffled to the front of the receiving line. They even handed out digital cameras and asked them to hold them up. [Via Macsmind.]****
As supporting evidence for the digital-cameras part of the story, the sergeant (or Mac, can’t tell which), suggests that the identical cameras can be verified in the AP photos. Looks right:
Uh, you have some substantiation to bash Obama over the Iraq visit. Big difference. People here are making claims about Obama’s role in the rescue with utterly no knowledge of what actually transpired.
Thank you and I agree with you.