To: tsmith130
“We are deeply concerned and we are following it very closely,” Clinton said
If i had a penny for every time a dem said this i would be rich....
3 posted on
04/08/2009 6:30:41 PM PDT by
GSP.FAN
To: GSP.FAN
the clintons are better at using the u.s. military against u.s. civilians
than directing the u.s. military at our enemies.
6 posted on
04/08/2009 6:32:12 PM PDT by
ken21
(the only thing we have to fear is fdr deja vu.)
To: GSP.FAN
To bad we don’t have “AND THE PEOPLE THAT KNOCKED DOWN THESE BUILDINGS WILL BE HEARING FROM US SHORTLY “ in office anymore
7 posted on
04/08/2009 6:32:51 PM PDT by
al baby
(Hi Mom)
To: GSP.FAN
Why don’t these ships carry weapons if they know they have to pass through this area? Even a few high powered rifles with good scopes could have helped them avoid being hijacked. I don’t know why the owner would announce to the world that the ships never carry weapons.
26 posted on
04/08/2009 6:43:16 PM PDT by
peeps36
( Al Gore. Is A Big Fat Lying Hypocrite. He Pollutes The Air By Opening His Big Mouth)
To: GSP.FAN; tsmith130; stboz; al baby; FightThePower!; ken21; LeoWindhorse; Gone_Postal; ...
“We are deeply concerned and we are following it very closely,” Clinton said.Saying out loud: they are following, not leading.
39 posted on
04/08/2009 6:53:36 PM PDT by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: GSP.FAN
You would NOT be rich because the dems would tax it all away from you.
182 posted on
04/09/2009 5:13:34 AM PDT by
rfreedom4u
(Diversity causes division and resentment.)
To: GSP.FAN
You don’t expect them to admit they’re actually shallowly concerned?
270 posted on
04/09/2009 2:40:11 PM PDT by
1010RD
(First Do No Harm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson