It still comes down to an argument for intelligent design, but only as far as it remains consistent with biblical creationism.
==No, but I’ve read the arguments for the premise.
It still comes down to an argument for intelligent design, but only as far as it remains consistent with biblical creationism.
Then whoever boiled the arguments down for you didn’t do a very good job. Priv. Planet assumes that the Earth is billions of years old. Does that sound like the authors keep their argument only go “as far as it remainst consistent with biblical creation”?