Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
The point is, when Evos find biological machinery that is finely tuned to produce random results, they have to assume that the finely tuned machinery was produced by random processes, and not design...

Finely tuned anything produced by random processes defies credibility.

I still can't figure how they mock *Goddidit* with a straight face and then offer that *nothing* did it, for no reason, all by itself.

256 posted on 04/09/2009 11:41:49 AM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

They don’t have to answer to “nothing.”


257 posted on 04/09/2009 11:43:37 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
Finely tuned anything produced by random processes defies credibility?

Check out “directed evolution” of enzymes for industrial usage. They utilize randomly generated DNA change and a strict selection mechanism to “design” a finely tuned protein product to accomplish a task.

Obviously you know less about the utility of randomness in a design process than you pretend.

261 posted on 04/09/2009 12:25:24 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson