To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Here is the current image from spaceweather.com.
One of the problems I have with current sunspot record keeping is that we are using technology now that was not available to observers in the past. In particular the Dalton Minimum did not count many of the proto and actual sunspots that have been counted over the past two years.
18 posted on
04/06/2009 1:28:16 PM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media.)
To: PA Engineer
One of the problems I have with current sunspot record keeping is that we are using technology now that was not available to observers in the past. In particular the Dalton Minimum did not count many of the proto and actual sunspots that have been counted over the past two years. So are you proposing that this is actually going to be worse as in closer to a Maunder Minimum?
20 posted on
04/06/2009 1:35:07 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(01-20-2009 : The end of the PAX AMERICANA.)
To: PA Engineer
Spaceweather got stupid-cute and scrapped the 30 some odd day continual spotless count because a microspot was evaluated to have formed for a half-second by some agency in Belgium.
23 posted on
04/06/2009 1:38:11 PM PDT by
Crazieman
(Feb 7, 2008 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1966675/posts?page=28#28)
To: PA Engineer
The “proto” sunspots were “magical thinking”. They didn’t happen. We are not yet into Cycle 24.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson