Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Here is the current image from spaceweather.com.



One of the problems I have with current sunspot record keeping is that we are using technology now that was not available to observers in the past. In particular the Dalton Minimum did not count many of the proto and actual sunspots that have been counted over the past two years.
18 posted on 04/06/2009 1:28:16 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the occupation media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PA Engineer
One of the problems I have with current sunspot record keeping is that we are using technology now that was not available to observers in the past. In particular the Dalton Minimum did not count many of the proto and actual sunspots that have been counted over the past two years.

So are you proposing that this is actually going to be worse as in closer to a Maunder Minimum?

20 posted on 04/06/2009 1:35:07 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (01-20-2009 : The end of the PAX AMERICANA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: PA Engineer

Spaceweather got stupid-cute and scrapped the 30 some odd day continual spotless count because a microspot was evaluated to have formed for a half-second by some agency in Belgium.


23 posted on 04/06/2009 1:38:11 PM PDT by Crazieman (Feb 7, 2008 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1966675/posts?page=28#28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: PA Engineer

The “proto” sunspots were “magical thinking”. They didn’t happen. We are not yet into Cycle 24.


104 posted on 04/06/2009 11:10:25 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson