Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tyke
What's really simple minded is the belief that full scale war between nuclear powers could ever be conducted with some medieval-style code of honor or enlightened self-interest that would keep nuclear weapons from the battlefield.

It's a shame we wasted all that treasure and effort trying to prove that we could take on the Soviets in Europe. We could have had universal health care by now. What the heck. If the Soviets attacked conventionally we would have had only two choices. Better than the 2 1/2 that being able to respond conventionally gave us.

236 posted on 04/06/2009 12:49:37 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: Stentor

Much of that build up of US forces in Europe was complete before the Soviet Union had a massive arsenal of nuclear weapons. But I grant that there is a better argument to be made for a strong air force being part of a deterrent, though that’s a more sensible and nuanced argument than claiming we need the F-22 so we can be sure to defeat the Chinese/Russians on the battlefield.

If it ever gets to the point where the two air forces come to blows in the skies, it will be almost certainly too late to prevent all out nuclear war — indeed, most Freepers would probably be agitating for the first strike to be ours.


260 posted on 04/06/2009 1:00:20 PM PDT by tyke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson