Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stinkerpot65

I don’t understand people that own pits or rots. I don’t begrudge them the right to do so, but they do need to keep these dogs secure, just like it is my responsibility to keep my choc lab secure. The risk is to great for me to allow my dog to run free. The risk to her and the risk of liability to me.

This is a very sad situation that could have been avoided if these particular dog owners took proper responsibility for their dogs. I know when I was living in farm land, if a dog was running loose, then it was at risk for being shot by the land owner. It was the “law of the land” and I would think that these dog owners would not have wanted to take that risk for their dogs.

With their chosen breeds, they were taking additional risks.


48 posted on 04/06/2009 8:15:58 AM PDT by CSM (Smokers, the most patriotic of Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CSM
With their chosen breeds, they were taking additional risks.

The primary risk is the owner, not the dog. Irresponsible people should not be allowed to have dogs of any breed without some sort of training, licensing or supervision.

52 posted on 04/06/2009 8:20:07 AM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson