Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CRBDeuce

“equal access to all employees during non-working hours for ‘’campaigning purposes’’.

I don’t get the equal access during non working hrs thing. Seems to me that when I am not working I can access any thing I choose, be it meetings or campaign work or whatever, exactly why or how would an employer be expected to provide equal access during non working hrs?


11 posted on 04/05/2009 3:43:12 PM PDT by tickles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: tickles

They want to ban the employers from holding any meetings before work, after work or during lunch time. In other words, if you are not on the floor working, the employer cannot talk to you.

They tried this in WA State this year, but the union leaders messed up by sending out intimidating emails in a mass emailing and someone reported it as bribery. The governor immediately pulled the bill from consideration.

It’s kind of a sticky situation for the WA government because they are being sued by several branches of the SEIU for not funding their contracts at the same time that the SEIU is pushing for Democrats to support their card check legislation and threatening to pull funding from the same Democrats.

Exposing the incestuous relationship between the politicians and the labor unions is a good way to fight them.


13 posted on 04/05/2009 3:50:59 PM PDT by Eva (union motto - Aim for mediocrity, it's only fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson