But doesn't the Bible repudiate any possibility of macro-evolution at all? Chapter 2 of Genesis tells us the God brought all animals to Adam to be named. Later Noah loaded them all onto the Ark. That would seem to mean that animals were animals, in the form they are now in. So what's with all the fossils? And what about the clear evolutionary progression that science has mapped for many species? Are they all wrong?
There is no evidence that man evolved from Homo Habilis. None.
But there is evidence that they existed. So if not early forms of man then what were they?
Who? Neandrthals? Nobody was in the Garden but Adam and Eve.
Adam, Eve, and all the animals that God created, including the snake. Why were Neanderthals and Habilis banned from the garden?
Show me where evolution can explain the development of complex organs and eyesight and flight?
You deny macro-evolution period, in all forms, and in all context. Evolution of any kind contradicts the Bible and the whole creationist story. All I'm asking is that if man and animals were created as is, as they are now, then what's with the fossil record for a whole host of creatures? Are the all wrong, every single one of them?
Well I guess that makes me a kook.
Your words, not mine.
You refuse to answer my questions. Why should I continue to answer yours?