To: Alter Kaker
"Why is it that when creationists are trying to attack or insult science, they accuse it of being like a religion?? Why is it that when creationists point out the philosophical nature of unobservable 'scientific' theories, the naturalists immediately fall into the fallacy of reverse ad hominem?
10 posted on
04/01/2009 7:03:06 AM PDT by
GourmetDan
(Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
To: GourmetDan
Why is it that when creationists point out the philosophical nature of unobservable 'scientific' theories, the naturalists immediately fall into the fallacy of reverse ad hominem?Well stated.
12 posted on
04/01/2009 7:11:04 AM PDT by
WVKayaker
(Coersion, after all, merely captures man. Freedom captivates him. - Ronald Reagan)
To: GourmetDan
There are a small number of as yet unobservable scientific theories. String theory is an obvious example. Evolution isn’t one of them.
18 posted on
04/01/2009 7:29:21 AM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson