[count-your-change]

” In the Lancet, David Nutt at Bristol University, along with his colleagues, asked psychologists and scientifically or medically trained police to rank different substances according to how harmful they are”

Isn't this the same David Nutt that said taking the drug Ecstasy was about as risky as riding a horse?
Sounds like an unbiased source of information and judgment
about marijuana, doesn't it?

[tacticalogic]

Sounds like an unbiased source of information and judgment about marijuana, doesn't it?

What exactly does "an unbiased source of information and judgement about marijuana" sound like?