[Reno232]

Are you speaking on behalf of Jim? Or is this just more rank speculation on your part? Do you really understand the freedom of speech clause? Law in general? No offense but what a rash statement! I would think that Jim would distance himself from your statement, & not b/c of any legal ramifications, but b/c of the absurdity of it.

[SENTINEL]

I never claimed to speak for Jim, it is with the LDS church and thier methods that I have VERY CURRENT experience with. Their use of the courts and false witness to destroy....Families in my case. I WON. Here is an excerpt from my custody order....

"Neither parent shall allow any religious figure to mentally or emotionally prepare any of the three daughters, directly or by inference, to live under polygamy, whether said polygamy takes place in this life or the next. Neither parent shall allow any religious figure to disparage the other parent, directly or by inference in front of the children, or to teach or coerce them in any way, into a desire to be married in a secret ceremony where either parent is not allowed to attend for any reason. Neither parent shall allow any religious figure to remove the girls clothing to rub their ”EDITED” or “EDITED” with oil, or for any other secret acts, or teach them that submission to these types of ceremonies are required to go to heaven. Neither parent shall allow any of the girls to be alone with any religious leader for any reason."