...though you're still wrong, as usual, in regard to Sarah Palin.
Donate to SarahPAC
Posted on 03/29/2009 1:54:33 PM PDT by Big Steve
If not 2012, at least by 2016. Myself, I look forward to the debates if she does get into the fray.
Then you are looking too far into the future. We need to concentrate on 2010 and getting back control of congress from Nancy and at least four or five reliable new Republicans in the senate... four years out the three of them with Rahm and buddies will destroy this country and, frankly, 2012 won’t be worth spit. Remember... Hitler was democratically elected in Germany.
...though you're still wrong, as usual, in regard to Sarah Palin.
Get over yourself. Long before Mccain won the nomination conservatives warned their liberal GOP bretheren not to nominate Rudy McRomney. And reminded them and reminded them again. We said it is the surest way to lose, nominating a RINO. They didn’t listen, gave all their money to Rudy McRomney and we got shellacked. Just as the conservatives predicted.
You would also probably say that you're "more conservative" than Reagan was. Yet until you win the presidency with two landslide victories your statement is meaningless.
You seem a decent sort, pissant, but after you spoke to Hunter and wouldn't ask about the *birth certificate* your credibility became very questionable.
For months you disparaged anyone who dared voice any doubt about your quest to declare Obama ineligible, yet here you had on the phone a recently retired congressman and aspirant to the presidency, and your excuse was that you 'didn't have enough time'.
Don't even think about critiquing Sarah Palin. She actually does whilst you merely talk.
I seem to recall you getting your panties in a twist last year when people went after Duncan, and later Huckabee.
Actually, Reagan was pretty damn conservative. Might want to read up on him sometime
Please, step away from the glue.
Uh, I love to argue. Bring it on. No panties in a twist ala the Fredheads. I defended Hunter’s record against the folks who knew next to nothing about it, yet pretended otherwise.
As for Huck, I helped lead the charge against him. So you recalled wrong.
I’ve read more, and know more about, Reagan than you ever will. And I can confidently say if he were alive today that Sarah Palin would have his unyielding support.
If she won the nomination, I’m sure she would. But Reagan, you may recall was the bain of environmentalists, so I doubt he would be spouting the McCain/Palin line on global warming.
I actually thing Reagan would likely support a real Reaganite myself. But its all speculation.
I really wish Duncan could get some momentum.
After it got down to McCain or Huckabee or Mitt, I had no idea what the hell to do, except cry.
You are parsing his words. His position never changed. Your man Mike Huckabee is in favor of cap and trade btw.
We are discussing Palin, not McCain. So please expound on HER "spouting the line on global warming". I'll find this interesting as she continually 'spouts' on our need to open more oil fields up and expand our exploration of oil - not exactly an endeavor that the global warming crowd would approve of.
Honey you need to go back in my history, you would know I NEVER supported Mike Huckabee. As to your man Romney, he changes positions as often as his underwear.
Did you hear her incoherent answers when asked about global warming? Apparently not.
And I know plenty about Reagan, apparently alot more than you, and putting Palin on that level is ludicrous.
Your knowledge of RR is wanting, at best. Feel free to think as you wish, she'll be the nominee, if she so desires it, in 2012.
Perhaps when you again speak to Hunter you can ask him what he thinks of her. That is, if you have time.
She’s the one that said multiple times that she did not have to “check my views” at the door when she accepted the nomination. FWIW.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.