“Please help me find the missing data, RFE. After all, Darwood was a great scientist, so he wouldn’t publish his Godless theory without data, now would he???”
So now I finally get it: You try to refute evolution without data because you think that the theory of evolution has no data.
I’ve got no specific opinion on Darwin himself. Just his theories are of interest, which have been revised and extended since then - as you have, no doubt noticed.
Oh, I see, you don’t know what became of the missing data either. Oh my. You don’t suppose the entire Evo science community could have fallen for a theory published by a non-scientist/med-school dropout turned amateur naturalist with no data to substantiate it do you?
And speaking of data. You seem to be quite confident there are data that support Darwood’s dataless theory of evolution. What data would that be exactly?