Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trailerpark Badass

So you would argue that someone who kills someone in self-defense should be treated the same as someone who pre-meditated their killing? As you would say, that would be “a distinction without a difference, in practical terms.”


67 posted on 03/26/2009 11:54:49 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Cancel liberal newspaper, magazine & cable TV subscriptions (Free TV-dtv.gov). Stop funding the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind
So you would argue that someone who kills someone in self-defense should be treated the same as someone who pre-meditated their killing? As you would say, that would be “a distinction without a difference, in practical terms.”

I don't think that analogy holds up.

Murder and killing are not the same acts, necessarily, and killing in self-defense is certainly not the same act as murder.

Driving impaired is driving impaired, regardless of the substance.

69 posted on 03/26/2009 11:58:51 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (Happiness is a choice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson