Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man

So, why do you think it is that, after the success of conservatism under Reagan, conservatives have failed miserably at getting a conservative the nomination for President, while the liberals seem to have no trouble getting their choices nominated?

Do you think this is the fault of moderates, or the fault of conservatives?


217 posted on 04/04/2009 7:18:23 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
Its not just since Reagan that the GOP has been nominating moderates. Since the end of WWII, the GOP has chosen moderates like Dewey, Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, GHW Bush, Bob Dole, GW Bush and McCain. Along with two conservatives, the unlikable Barry Goldwater and the likable Ronald Reagan.

The Democrats haven nominated all liberals since the end of WWII --- Truman, Stevenson, Kennedy, Johnson, Humprhey, McGovern, Carter, Mondale, Dukakis, Clinton, Gore, Kerry and Obama.

During that time the US has moved further and further leftward. You wonder why? LOL

Unlike the Democratic Party, which is basically filled with 99% faithful liberals. The modern Republican Party is about 60% dyed-in-the-wool conservatives. Another 25% are staunch fiscal conservatives and 15% are liberals --- or what we use to call, Rockefeller Republicans. The later is where you'll find most of the neo-cons.

Its that moderate, or centrist constituency that runs the GOP from their lofty perch high above us rightwing commoners. They've been choosing who gets the bulk of the party support and the financial backing to run for the nomination. That wasn't more evident then in the last election. Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter represented serious conservatism, but could never gain widespread support. Giulaini and Romney represented the liberal wing, while McCain and Huckabee represented the more moderate wing of the GOP. And what happened? The party was torn apart. If it wasn't for Sarah Palin, McCain would have lost as bad as Goldwater did in 1964.

Conservatives who believe in supporting a strict agenda on all issues and adherence to the Constitution, don't ever get the proper representation from the GOP party elites. AKA.: The Powers That Be. Eventually, the only answer is for conservatives to form a party of their own. One that advances OUR traditional values and beliefs, along with OUR core principles and convictions.

Just as Reagan did in the late 1970`s, we conservatives need to tell the moderates, if you want to join us, fine. Otherwise, there is no room for a center/center-left policy agenda in a "Conservative Party". And there is no room for liberal candidates like Giuliani and Romney, or moderate candidates like McCain and Huckabee. They may be able to serve in some capacity, just not as President or Vice President.

I figure if the Democrats can unite behind a liberal-socialist agenda for the last 75 years. Conservatives should be able to unite behind an agenda based on the Constitution and more in line with the Reagan policy agenda of the 1980`s and Newt's CWA agenda of the 1990`s.

The GOP has a serious leadesrhip void. Until we find someone who has solid conservative credentials, serious political skills and strong leadership abilities, the GOP will not win back the Presidency or the Congress.

So, blame whoever you want. You know where I stand.

218 posted on 04/04/2009 11:22:54 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson