~~~
Mohammed Atta eyes. Obama gets that look, too. So does Huma Abedin, Hillary's whatever.
Posted on 03/24/2009 3:17:59 PM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32
I won't be watching but will follow in this thread for those who dare to actually watch..
"stop illegal guns from going to Mexico" + "every-body's gotta sacrifice" = "no more Second Amendment".
Besides, that pesky Second Amendment is getting in the way of taking away the rest of our rights.
I know! I can’t believe he changed the prompter type! Too funny! I was reading FR, went in the living room and the husband was watching Zero. I had to make noise to avoid hearing The Usurper while I retreated back to the computer room again. How anyone, esp my conservative husband can listen to that guy is beyond me. My husband is way more tolerant of liberals than I am. He can listen without getting mad. I just don’t like to waste my time on them, and what they say makes me angry. So I just skip it. Better things to do. Anything but listen to Der Fuhrer. He’s on TV all the dang time! What an ego! He should know better than to alter when AI is on. What a twerp! Cheers!
Bill called Barry brilliant last night, too. Made me scream.
Sorry, but my sister and I were both educated entirely within the Catholic school system.
I blame my sister’s politics on her attending UW Madison.
LOL!!! I’m dyin’ here!!!!!!!Keyboard cleanup, Aisle 13!!!
That's from the playbook chapter entitled "Every Republican is stupid or evil or both, and every Democrat is a benevolent genius".
Chickens, they need chickens to crap all over the whitey house lawn to complete the scene. And if they got an old junk car to park out by the limos it would be perfect.
Yes. They coherently plan to take every last penny you earn.
Enlightening. I’m thinking the American people are waking up. I think the election wasn’t so much about wanting Obama as people wanting to be done with politics as usual. Now, they are realizing that Obama is worse than politics as usual.
~~~
Mohammed Atta eyes. Obama gets that look, too. So does Huma Abedin, Hillary's whatever.
Wow, I completely forgot! Did I miss anything?
Yup, he uses his tongue prettier than a two dollar whore.
There’s more but I can’t say it here.
“I still can’t believe that NO ONE created it
just in time for the election or had a clue
it was naturally coming around the bend.”
You might want to read this. It was a perfect storm, but it appears that there was intent:
The purpose of this financial crisis is to take down the United States and the U.S. dollar as the stable datum of planetary finance
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9454
Nor the essence of the stem cell debate, ‘cause
the press keeps propping up the demon’s position
and pulling the wool over the public’s eyes by
NOT USING THE WORDS: EMBRYONIC stem cells.
For those who didn’t know and any lib lurkers:
~~~~
February 19, 2008
Links to Barack Obama’s votes on IL’s Born Alive Infant Protection Act
Below is a listing of then-state Senator Barack Obama’s votes and state senate floor speeches on IL’s Born Alive Infant Protection Act.
(At right is a political cartoon by Jack Higgins, printed in the Chicago Sun-Times on August 25, 2004, during his U.S. Senate campaign.)
http://www.jillstanek.com/obama.jpg
A package of Born Alive bills was introduced three times during Obama’s tenure.
The cornerstone bill was the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, aka “Born Alive Infant Defined,” which defined legal personhood to include born alive infants any time the words “person,” “human being,” “child,” or “individual” was stated in IL law.
This definition was identical to the federal BAIPA which was drafted from the definition of “live birth” created by the World Health Organization in 1950 and adopted by the United Nations in 1955.
Following are Obama’s actions and votes on Born Alive. The bill number changed every year it was reintroduced.
2001
Senate Bill 1095, Born Alive Infant Protection Act
Obama’s “no” vote in the IL Senate Judiciary Committeehere, March 28, 2001
Transcript of Obama’s verbal opposition to Born Alive on the IL Senate floor, March 30, 2001, pages 84-90
Obama’s “present” vote on the IL Senate floor, March 30, 2001
2002
Senate Bill 1662, Born Alive Infant Protection Act
Obama’s “no” vote in the Senate Judiciary Committee, March 6, 2002
Transcript of Obama’s verbal opposition to Born Alive on the IL Senate floor, April 4, 2002, pages 28-35
Obama’s “no” vote on the IL Senate floor, April 4, 2002
Listen to audio from Obama’s 2002 IL Senate floor debate wherein he argued that while babies might be aborted alive, it would be a “burden” to a mother’s “original decision” to assess and treat them.
Meanwhile, the federal Born Alive Infants Protection Act with a “neutrality clause” added passed the U.S. Senate 98-0, the U.S. House overwhelmingly, and was signed into law August 5, 2002. The pro-abortion group NARAL expressed neutrality on the bill.
2003
Senate Bill 1082, Born Alive Infant Protection Act
Democrats took control of the IL Senate with the 2002 elections. This year Born Alive was sent to the Health & Human Services Committee, chaired by Barack Obama.
As can be seen on the vote docket, Obama first voted to amend SB1082 to add the “neutrality clause” from the federal version of Born Alive to the IL version to make them absolutely identical. (DP#1 means “Do Pass Amendment #1.)
Then Obama voted against the identical version. (DPA means, “Do Pass as Amended.)
Additional corroboration of Obama’s vote: IL State Senate Republican Staff Analysis of SB 1082, March 12-13, 2003, bottom of page 2
For 4 years following his 2003 vote Obama misrepresented it, stating the wording of the IL version of Born Alive was not the same as the federal version, and he would have voted for it if so. As recently as August 16, 2008 Obama made this false assertion.
But when evidence presented was irrefutable, Obama’s campaign on August 18, 2008, admitted the truth to the New York Sun.
The nonpartison group FactCheck.org has since corroborated Obama voted against identical legislation as passed overwhelmingly on the federal level and then misrepresented his vote.
http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/02/links_to_barack.html
Is that really the Dorks watch?
Not cool at all. Reminds me of a teenager.
This was a BSOTUS waste of time. What was it for anyway? The socialist sell of America?
AND, he talked about Israel with out using the name "Israel". I think he said, "them" or some such descriptor. Couldn't bring himself to say "Israel". Interesting.
Here's a nice shot of the president on the far left and Mr. Obama on the right doing the reading for the president.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
