Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cedric
Remember, I specified "beentzy" wings worthless for anything except making the poor misbegotten possessor, thereof, more cumbersome, less well balanced and, ultimately, less fit to survive.

Why should anything have "beentzy" wings, if wings evolved from arms (or front legs)? What, you think they grew wings and then lost their arms? You've been playing too much Spyro the Dragon.

And the artist renderings are based on about 9 pretty good casts, like this:

Interestingly, some of them show feather development on the hind legs, too, which is a pretty good indication that feathers had a purpose before the animals had wings as we know them today.

68 posted on 03/23/2009 5:18:40 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
Nice try.

Okay, I'll play your shell game:

Explain this: How did the relatively huge hind legs (with or without feathers) which no doubt made flight impossible for eons make the creature more fit for survival during those scores of millions of years while its aforementioned legs became more spindly and, therefore, less able to walk, run and hunt but not yet skinny enough to facilitate flight?

80 posted on 03/24/2009 5:48:28 AM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson