Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global warming? More doubts
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | March 21, 2009 | Masthead Editorial

Posted on 03/21/2009 6:05:11 PM PDT by neverdem

New studies suggest that "global warming" -- no matter if its origins are proffered as man-made or part of a natural cycle -- might soon require a new name. Can you say "global stasis" or "global cooling"?

Scientists at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee applied a math formula to climate data for the past 100 years. They found Earth's air and ocean systems now are showing signs of synchronizing with each other.

That might explain why the researchers found the warming trend of the past 30 years has stopped and that the planet's temperatures have leveled off since 2001. And that might help explain why there seem to be fewer bad storms.

A study of global tropical cyclone activity by Ryan N. Maue, a doctoral student at the Department of Meteorology at Florida State University, suggests global warming might be greatly overblown...

(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agw; catastrophism; globalcooling; globalstasis; globalwarming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
What kind of paper is the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, conservative, libertarian or just objective? IHMO, when I come across their writers, there's almost no liberal nonsense.
1 posted on 03/21/2009 6:05:11 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

When it comes to liberals, objectivity breeds contempt.


2 posted on 03/21/2009 6:11:13 PM PDT by HoosierHawk (Democrats - Looting American citizens for generations to come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review is owned by Mellon Bank heir Richard Mellon Scaife. It is somewhat conservative in outlook.


3 posted on 03/21/2009 6:18:46 PM PDT by Steely Tom (RKBA: last line of defense against vote fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative; airborne; smoothsailing; Dr. Scarpetta; martin_fierro; Coop; Tribune7; ...

Global cooling ping in a major paper, IMHO.


4 posted on 03/21/2009 6:18:59 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Climate is what we expect, weather is what we get.

LAZARUS LONG


5 posted on 03/21/2009 6:19:49 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunhem?), change America will die for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

The evil, conservative Richard Mellon Scaife, it figures. Thank you!


6 posted on 03/21/2009 6:21:55 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; Delacon; CygnusXI; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

7 posted on 03/21/2009 6:24:24 PM PDT by steelyourfaith ("Most bad government results from too much government." - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
global warming might be greatly overblown

Overblown? Hoax works for me. A means to a global Socialist end.

8 posted on 03/21/2009 6:24:32 PM PDT by hugorand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Nobody can predict global temperature changes even five years ahead. There are cyclical aspects to these changes, but the cycles are so complex (with an apparent chaotic aspect), that it is simply unpredictable.

There is a major cycle, however, that will eventually prevail. Sometime in the next few thousand years (possibly in the next decade), we will start to enter the next ice age. The Earth will not get much warmer than it is right now, before the next ice age starts.

CO2 levels do not drive temperature changes, it is the other way around, with about a thousand year time lag. The current increases in CO2 have nothing to do with human activity, but rather are caused by the Midieval Warm Period. We have about 250 years to go on this cycle.

Our air is CO2 depleted right now. All Earthly plants have evolved to use CO2 levels 2 to 5 times higher than today's. When exposed to higher CO2 levels, plants grow faster and require less nutrients and water.

Crop yields have improved a lot over the last 150 years, largely due to improvements in technology, but a substantial portion of that improvement is due to rising CO2 levels.

Many scientists are well aware of these facts, but all the press goes to lying panic mongers who make a very good living by dispensing misinformation.

9 posted on 03/21/2009 6:26:09 PM PDT by 3niner (Hoover turned a recession into a depression, FDR turned it into The Great Depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3niner
Nobody can predict global temperature changes even five years ahead. There are cyclical aspects to these changes, but the cycles are so complex (with an apparent chaotic aspect), that it is simply unpredictable.

Exactly. There are hundreds of variables which have significant contributions to climate, and we are only guessing at how much each one contributes. Besides the fact that the climate data is not really all that accurate, it is impossible to isolate each variable. The idea they could conclusively say CO2 is the dominate variable effecting climate change is completely absurd and only basis is the bias of the scientific community which gets billions in research dollars to say so. No honest scientist based on the data could conclude CO2 is even a major factor, let alone a dominate factor.

10 posted on 03/21/2009 6:36:15 PM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

If all your posts were as succinct and accurate as this one, your FReeper name would be plus apropos.

;^)


11 posted on 03/21/2009 6:39:21 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Always Right; 3niner; neverdem

They’ve been predicting rain where I live for like five days in a row now. It hasn’t shown up yet. They can’t predict the weather 24 hours in advance, with what is undoubtedly a much simpler computer model than the global warming model. Who in their right mind really believes that the global warming computer simulations have any basis in reality?


12 posted on 03/21/2009 6:43:03 PM PDT by Hardastarboard (The Fairness Doctrine isn't about "Fairness" - it's about Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
and only basis is the bias of the scientific community which gets billions in research dollars to say so.

I think it may also because CO2 output is something that can readily be measured (based on the inputs of fuel purchased), leading to its usefulness as a commodity which Algore's Carbon Credit Trading scheme can make money on.

13 posted on 03/21/2009 6:44:04 PM PDT by Wissa (I despise the liberal media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

Thanks, but unfortunately, many of my posts are typo-ridden sarcastic ramblings. Every once in a while I nail one.


14 posted on 03/21/2009 6:46:13 PM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
They can’t predict the weather 24 hours in advance, with what is undoubtedly a much simpler computer model than the global warming model.

Actually, the Global Warming computer models are relatively simple. Capitalism = We're Doomed!

15 posted on 03/21/2009 6:48:28 PM PDT by Wissa (I despise the liberal media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wissa
I think it may also because CO2 output is something that can readily be measured (based on the inputs of fuel purchased), leading to its usefulness as a commodity which Algore's Carbon Credit Trading scheme can make money on.

I was speaking of the motives of the scientific community. Certainly politicians have their own motives such as socialistic control, killing capitalistic prosperity, and also personal gain.

16 posted on 03/21/2009 6:51:24 PM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Algore's Carbon Credit Trading scheme was originally conceived as a money-maker by Enron, of memorable notoriety.
17 posted on 03/21/2009 7:09:51 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Global Warming/Cap and trade scam special!

Society Insults Members by Honoring Hansen

Climate Change Myths and Facts (Barf Alert!)

Green Hustler (Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise, & Innovation at the White House Council)

Inhofe Exposes Cap and Tax Scheme in Obama Budget

18 posted on 03/21/2009 7:55:26 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Here's a link to the actual paper:

Has the climate recently shifted? (PDF)

Here are the paper's conclusions:

"Finally, it is vital to note that there is no comfort to be gained by having a climate with a significant degree of internal variability, even if it results in a near-term cessation of global warming. It is straightforward to argue that a climate with significant internal variability is a climate that is very sensitive to applied anthropogenic radiative anomalies (c.f. Roe [2009]). If the role of internal variability in the climate system is as large as this analysis would seem to suggest, warming over the 21st century may well be larger than that predicted by the current generation of models, given the propensity of those models to underestimate climate internal variability [Kravtsov and Spannagle 2008].

19 posted on 03/21/2009 8:18:50 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Thanks for the link.

"Finally, it is vital to note that there is no comfort to be gained by having a climate with a significant degree of internal variability, even if it results in a near-term cessation of global warming. It is straightforward to argue that a climate with significant internal variability is a climate that is very sensitive to applied anthropogenic radiative anomalies (c.f. Roe [2009]).

When they can also account for phenomena external to our atmosphere, I might get concerned about a minor increase in a trace gas.

If the role of internal variability in the climate system is as large as this analysis would seem to suggest, warming over the 21st century may well be larger than that predicted by the current generation of models, given the propensity of those models to underestimate climate internal variability [Kravtsov and Spannagle 2008].

I'll believe in a model when they have one that can reproduce the historical data.

20 posted on 03/21/2009 8:57:30 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson