Where did I say we should have invaded Iraq in 1998? The issue then was whether we should through various means pursue ultimately regime change. Matter of factly I think we should have removed him in 1991 already. Stop making things up.
And where the HECK did I mention Kosovo here? Matter of factly I repeatedly said that the Balkans are not our issue.
Sanford said his principles are a) no force unless after we are attacked and b) no regime change ever, even through nonviolent means. He is a surrender monkey, and you try to desperately spin my words to fit your argument.
BTW it’s funny how you think that mentioning “Muslim” makes your case about Kosovo more meaningful. So you think “policing the world” is okay if it does not involve Muslims? Make you stance clear, and stop meandering.
So you don’t have a link with Sanford’s remarks in context, just an opinion. And yes, I think it makes a difference that we were supporting Muslim terrorists in Europe that were beheading Christians in the 90’s and got stampeded into supporting our government’s military action by a press that didn’t report honestly. Nobody has talked about it much becomes the Dems wanted to support Clinton and the neocons want to run around the world using our troops for the greater glory . . . but it was a damn dumb and wasteful policy and Sanford was against it. Make fun of it if you want but he was right.