Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Woebama
Ah the same old meme of "we cannot police the world"... Sanford said we should only use military means AFTER being attacked and he is by principle against other measures of regime change.

So by his and your comments I understand that we should let folks like Saddam or Khamenei subvert, invade and conquer other countries, fund terrorists who kill our citizens and develop nukes and chemical weapons and threaten us and or allies. But genius Sanford would only act AFTER they hit us.

We can really do without that kind of CinC.

He not only wouldn't take out their WMD capabilites, but also reject non-violent means to foil these regimes. I don't want us to police the world... but I sure as heck want anyone who wants to destroy and blackmail us foiled.

37 posted on 03/21/2009 11:55:50 AM PDT by SolidWood (Palin: "In Alaska we eat therefore we hunt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: SolidWood

So we should have invaded Iraq in 1998 and you supported sending our troops to aid the muslims in Kosovo? That seems to be what you are saying when I peel the sarcasm away. Post the comment in full contecxt that you are talking about with Sanford if you actually have it.


38 posted on 03/21/2009 12:02:01 PM PDT by Woebama (Paying for my neighbor's mortgage and Wall Street's bonuses sure is hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson