Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Big_Monkey

I’m not asserting that the taxpayer isn’t on the hook. I’m asserting that as a shareholder they don’t have any legal right to void the contract.

Others have argued that the tax is just voiding an untenable contract. I am asserting that shareholders have no right to do so (no matter how powerful those shareholders might be). And, since they have no right to void the contract by tax, they are, in essence, imposing a penalty on the beneficiaries of the contract without due process of law.


143 posted on 03/19/2009 1:37:25 PM PDT by keepitreal (Obama brings change: an international crisis (terrorism) within 6 months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: keepitreal
"I’m not asserting that the taxpayer isn’t on the hook. I’m asserting that as a shareholder they don’t have any legal right to void the contract.

MY MISTAKE - you have my deepest apologies and 100% concurrence with your position.

150 posted on 03/19/2009 1:40:46 PM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson