Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Col Freeper
Feeding frenzy!

Check out the new AP headline:

Dodd: Administration sought bonus limit revision Posted here

39 posted on 03/18/2009 6:27:35 PM PDT by icwhatudo (The Dow is down over 5,000 points since democrats took back congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: icwhatudo; All
I need a shower now. Intersting variation alright. Little timmy next under the bus?

"The Treasury Department demanded that Sen. Chris Dodd insert exemptions into the stimulus bill that allowed bailout recipients to receive bonuses, the Connecticut Democrat said on Wednesday.

According to Dodd, officials at Treasury expressed concern that if the government were to prohibit payouts, it risked being sued by companies like AIG, which had contracts stipulating that bonuses were to be paid.

At the urging of Treasury officials, Dodd modified a clause he had previously inserted into the stimulus that prohibited bonuses from being issued by bailed-out companies. An exemption was added to allow bonuses that applied to in-place contracts.

"The alternative was, in my view, losing the entire section on executive excessive compensation," he said. "Given the choice ... I agreed to a modification in the legislation, reluctantly. I wasn't negotiating with myself. I wasn't changing my own amendment. I was changing the amendment because others were insisting on it."

"I would have preferred that we kept my language, as it left the Senate unanimously," Dodd added. "In fact there were objections when I wrote the language even before it left the Senate. ... The administration expressed reservations with the amendment. They came to us and asked for modifications in the amendment. The alternative was, of course, losing the amendment entirely, which was a possibility. I didn't want to see that happen. I suspect we would be having a conversation tonight why we didn't include some language in here to deal with bonuses, golden parachutes and the like. ... I don't believe anyone had any idea, I certainly didn't, that a month and a half later from February we would be talking about AIG and the bonuses they are receiving for their retentions, these $165 million. So that was never a part of the consideration."

The disclosure should put to rest one aspect of the debate over how a company like AIG, which has received $170 billion in taxpayer funds, was allowed to dole out $165 million in bonus payments. Still unresolved is who in conference removed the amendment introduced by Sens. Wyden and Snowe that would have taxed bonuses exceeding $100,000 at 35 percent.

41 posted on 03/18/2009 6:34:43 PM PDT by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: icwhatudo
Dodd yesterday told CNN and other news agency he had nothing whatever to do with putting the language permitting these bonuses to AIG until this February 2009. He vigorously denied any knowledge of any such change to his amendment that would have barred it absolutely. Today he comes on CNN and admits that he was in error, not only did he know that the change was made but approved same. He said it was done at the behest of the administration although he would not identify who in the administration pressed for the change. Dodd is not only a first class liar but he is an insufferable, arrogant, demagogue.
43 posted on 03/18/2009 6:39:25 PM PDT by brydic1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson