Pot. Kettle. Black.
The textbook I cited is a result of thousands of peer-revewed scientific papers. There are THOUSANDS of references. There are pictures for you creationists. All the data had to stand up to rigorous review by others in the field with re-experiment and revision when the data didn't make sense or the descriptions were vague during the review process. Compare this to a book that was written hundreds of years after the events may have happened from spoken stories and then translated into numerous languages (with mistake)to evolve into what it is today. Hey, the Bible evolves!
And to be your 'peers' they would have to share your agenda, which would be the same agenda as the Nobel committee, that gives prizes to terrorists and their comrades, and great 'scientists' like Algore, right?
My case rests on firm bedrock.