Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
My answer was not so lengthy that you needed to abridge it. It was clear from my context that lactase is only of no use to something without access to a ready supply of milk.

Most adult mammals will never get an opportunity to drink milk, so no, a lactase gene would be of no use.

To a nursing mammal it is of primary importance.

To a human with cattle it is a distinct advantage to have this mutation.

So much for the ‘no advantage to any change in DNA’ idiocy.

59 posted on 03/16/2009 4:03:42 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
Most adult mammals will never get an opportunity to drink milk, so no, a lactase gene would be of no use.

B.S. They are called mammals for a reason. Milk is readily available where there are mammals. A nursing mammal is merely a mammal that drinks milk. As long as a female is capable of giving birth lactose can be used. So don't beg the question. Does lactase have a use? And I did not abridge what your conclusion was.

60 posted on 03/16/2009 4:16:40 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson