Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scotswife
I’m with you on that, although I think she contributes so much in her depiction of left wing thoughts/arguments and was so prophetic about the slow creep of socialism that I’m willing to overlook her faults.

Nah.... Plenty of other folks have seen and written about the slow creep of socialism, and to much greater practical effect. (See the early history of National Review, for example, which helped to lay the foundations for Reagan's revolution.)

Rand's "strength" is in drawing caricatures of people to illustrate her ideas. That tendency is actually far more harmful to our side than anything the left does. When one looks at the world as so thoroughly black and white Rand painted it, one is left unable to deal with the world (and the people in it) as they actually exist.

One look at the lamentably awful state of American politics these days is enough to demonstrate the dangers inherent in dealing with caricatures.

150 posted on 03/16/2009 2:26:49 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb

I guess it just depends with what perspective you take.

The copy I have goes into her mindset as she wrote the book.

She didn’t intend for her characters to be “real” so much as to make an argument with their exagerrated characteristics.

She witnessed the destruction of capitalism as a girl and the idea for the book came when she wondered what would have happened if people reacted out of strength and defiance instead of fear.


159 posted on 03/16/2009 9:10:15 PM PDT by Scotswife (GO ISRAEL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson