[Kansas58]

LOL
My words are pretty much the same as several notable conservatives, though I came to most of my conclusions on my own.

You, sir, do not meet MY definition of a “Conservative” because you seem to figure out what you want, and then you seem to determine that everything you want is Constitutional and everything you don't want is “Unconstitutional” -—

From what I have seen so far, that is what you are doing.

There is no logical argument against my viewpoint:

Obama MIGHT have a problem, if Obama was NOT born in the USA.

McCain had NO problem, as his Parents could clearly pass Citizenship to McCain.

Jindal has NO problem, as Jindal was clearly born in the United States.

Show me ANYONE in any Court, ANY member of Congress, or the opinion of any Constitutional Scholar or ANY immigration or citizenship attorney who disagrees with me, would you?

You can't.

[MHGinTN]

You poor fool. Did you think playing obamanoid ‘in your face’ bluster would side step your refusal to even read posts like #81? Go play with your fellow obamanoid agitprops.

[Star Traveler]

I’m having fun reading through this conversation — because you’re *so on target* here...

You said (to another poster) — “You, sir, do not meet MY definition of a “Conservative” because you seem to figure out what you want, and then you seem to determine that everything you want is Constitutional and everything you don’t want is “Unconstitutional” -—”

—

Yes, indeed — it’s *that very thing* — as you describe it, that is going on. It’s exactly as you say. It’s first “you figure out what you want” — and then, secondly “it is Constitutional”... and then, yes, everything you don’t want is then “Unconstitutional”....

You’ve nailed it exactly, along with the “resulting labels” of “liberal” “Obot” “troll” etc. etc and etc... LOL...