That’s where we differ, Kansas. It is equally rational to assume that allegiance-in-birth and jurisdiction-in-birth combined define “natural born”. And there is historic precedent documented sufficient not only to support this position but to deem it as *declaratory*, a legal term, in my mind and in numerous others. That is why it is imperative that the legislature and court systems not shirk their responsibility yet again in this matter. What was common sense in the days of Washington is no longer the case today. We can at least agree that the “birther bill” is a much needed step in the right direction. Yes?
YES!
And, I want as many states as possible to so the same thing.
Each statute, each law, will give us more avenues in Court, as well.