Perhaps, but DISABLED Vets is the key phrase here ... no way should these costs be offloaded onto private insurers who would then subrogate those costs back to the right place, the US Government. All this would do is add ANOTHER layer of bureaucracy and cost. Sorry, we have a moral AND legal obligation to our disabled vets. Why doesn’t Shineski understand this /rhetorical - no answer necessary
Did you read my second paragraph, along with the first?