I don’t think its fair to equate Global Warming and Evolution.
Moonbats support the former, not the latter.
Here are the similarities:
1. They are both “historical sciences” as opposed to experimental science. Instead of testing hypotheses by conducting experiments, both use the historical record to confirm their hypotheses.
2. Both have adherents that completely overstate the theory that is not confirmable even by the historic record. Natural Selection and Evolution no more support atheism than they do any other religion. Farting cows have no more impact on global temperatures than aliens in neighboring galaxies.
3. Those “Darwin” athiests: They’re moonbats.
I don’t think its fair to equate Global Warming and Evolution.
Moonbats support the former, not the latter.
It depends on what you’re talking about...the theory or the cult of evolution, and most certainly moonbats support the cult.
BTW...do you know of any moonbats that support creationism, let alone Christianity, marriage exclusively between a man and a woman, etc?
And it’s not exactly helpful for one to side with the godless liberal secular humanist NEA silencing all dissent of darwinism and pretend you’re a conservative.
IN FACT it makes you look alot more like a moonbat!