TO 
instead of looking down your nose at people you dissagree with, how about backing up your claim and presenting evidnece to support macroevolution, which I am quite confident, will be quickly and efficiently refuted and exposed as the half-baked tomfoolery that it really is. Waving one’s hand, and dismissing everythign with a ‘you don’t undertstand’ isn’t exactly a valid coutnerargument, and is more at home in forums that don’t care to have hteir claims examined in detail and exposed.
So let’s see all the evidences for macroevolution- this ought to be rich. Let’s see hte actual evidence, not some far leaping ASSUMPTIONS based on morphological similarities either!
Answer then the question - have you read the original treatise “Origin of Species?” I could explain how popcorn works - but if you’ve already have made up your mind that it works by “magic” then I’m wasting my time.
TO