[curiosity]

There is just an extract document that was given for any births (even foreign) that were registered in Hawaii within one year of the birth.

A COLB for a foreign birth isn't going to list Hononlulu as the place of birth, unless you are asserting that Hawaii deliberately lies on its officially certified forms.

Are you seriously asserting that? If so, what is your evidence?

[Political Junkie Too]

I also can't explain the difference between "date filed" and "date accepted." Why the different nomenclature?

I think the speculation is that the information they print is the information that was provided, either by the hospital or by the parents. The "date filed" vs. "date accepted" distinguishes whether the document was accepted from the hospital at birth or was filed by the parents within one year of birth.

I could be wrong about the interpretation (maybe they just changed the language on the form blank), but there are two nomenclatures on the document images that I've seen.

-PJ