Ah, so this approach of denigrating the arguments as merely fantasy fishing expeditions IS the latest Axelrod talking point! Glad we got that clarified so early this evening.
“Ah, so this approach of denigrating the arguments as merely fantasy fishing expeditions IS the latest Axelrod talking point! Glad we got that clarified so early this evening.”
Nothing denigrating. Merely an observation that one of “the arguments” seems about as good, as the next.
Or if I am wrong about that observation, then which of the five is the strongest, and why?