To: ArrogantBustard; SJackson
I first noticed CE/BCE cropping up just over 20 years ago. At the time, it appeared to be motivated by anti-intellectualism (AD is Latin) and a vague desire to dechristianize the calendar.AD is Latin for year of the lord. Anyone who is a student of Elohim's Holy Word knows
that YHvH who created the universe would be offended
to think that the first 4000 years was rejected.
The use of the term AD is an insult to the loving G-d
who created this time-space continuum for us.
shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach Adonai
19 posted on
03/12/2009 9:13:26 AM PDT by
Uri’el-2012
(Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
To: XeniaSt
Thank you for expressing your personal opinion on matters.
I think you're wrong.
As usual.
Good Day.
20 posted on
03/12/2009 9:14:54 AM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: All
Anyone who is a student of Holy Scripture knows that God who created the universe would be offended to think that the first 4000 years was rejected. Acknowledging the year of Christ's birth is not a rejection of time before then. God, the First Person of the Holy Trinity, is not so delicate and overwrought as that.
The use of the term AD is an insult to the loving God who created this time-space continuum for us.
Quite the contrary: the use of the term AD is an expression of praise and joy on the birth of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity.
21 posted on
03/12/2009 9:19:38 AM PDT by
Petronski
(For the next few years, Gethsemane will not be marginal. We will know that garden. -- Cdl. Stafford)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson