Freeman hits 'Israel lobby' on way out

Politico ^ | March 10, 2009 | Ben Smith

[Scanian]

President Barack Obama's controversial pick for a top intelligence post blasted the "Israel lobby" on his way out the door Tuesday, intensifying a debate on the role Israel's allies played in the latest failed Obama appointment.

Charles W. Freeman Jr.'s abrupt withdrawal from his appointment as chairman of the National Intelligence Council came after he drew fire on a number of fronts - including questions about his financial ties to China and Saudi Arabia.

But the most heated opposition came from supporters of Israel - and Freeman's departure shows Obama's reluctance to signal a change to a U.S. policy in the Middle East that centers on standing beside Israel.

Throughout his presidential campaign, Obama jettisoned aides and backed off statements that appeared to imply a change in the Bush Administration's firm support for hawkish Israeli governments.

As president, Obama dispatched Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the Middle East last week with a tough message for the Palestinians, saying it was hard for Israel to make peace with people who are hurling rockets into their country.

And the attacks on Freeman, in the end, hinged primarily on the question of Israel, something the Democratic senators who helped break the back of the nomination Tuesday made clear.

[monkeyshine]

Well American Jews are still Americans and still human and as political as anyone else. Israel is not their only issue. For Liberal Jews there is abortion and ecology and a whole host of leftist ideas. Their reluctance to openly speak out against Obama may be in part because there are many other issues where Obama and the Jewish left agree. They probably figure they can achieve the small goal without a public break. And I’m sure they also want to preserve their coalition as well and not drive people (donors) away.