To: LeGrande; DevNet
There is a small amount of information on tumors, not ‘tons’ and no indication that they were “cancer,” so save us the Barbara Streisand.
81 posted on
03/11/2009 7:11:29 AM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: editor-surveyor; DevNet
There is a small amount of information on tumors, not ‘tons’ and no indication that they were “cancer,” so save us the Barbara Streisand. Well maybe not 'tons', but tumors are by definition cancer. And before you say no that's not true, the only difference between benign and malignant is the rate of growth.
If the point you were trying to make is that cancer is a relatively recent major factor in mortality rates I will agree (primarily because antibiotics and immunizations have been so effective at stopping disease).
82 posted on
03/11/2009 9:30:51 AM PDT by
LeGrande
(I once heard a smart man say that you canÂ’t reason someone out of something that they didnÂ’t reaso)
To: editor-surveyor
You ignore the actual cancers cells find in some Egyptian mummies.
How do you explain something existing before you claim it could?
87 posted on
03/11/2009 4:47:56 PM PDT by
DevNet
(What's past is prologue)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson