I don’t know, but WA state did it in 2004 in the governor’s race. It went to court and all that (more votes than voters) was presented to the judge, and it didn’t seem to bother him. He upheld the “election” of the ‘Rat. There seems to be a great reluctance on the part of the judicial to even consider any decision that might overturn the results of an election “in the books”. This, I think, was the Frankenputz strategy all along. Get enough votes to “win”, then get it booked and certified, and count on the historical reticence of the courts to upset the apple cart on a “decided” election.