Posted on 03/06/2009 9:15:49 AM PST by EternalVigilance
In a move that should give social conservatives great pause, Governor Sarah Palin has appointed a former board member of Planned Parenthood to the Alaska State Supreme Court.
Palin appointed Anchorage Superior Court Judge Morgan Christen to the state’s highest court on Wednesday. Along with Christen’s former board member status with Planned Parenthood.
There is no disputing Palin’s appointment of Christen will cause the Alaska Supreme to lean left and will ensure a more activist court when it comes to gay marriage, and abortion. The Christen appointment is key because she replaces justice Warren Mathews, one of the dissenting votes striking down the parental consent legislation.
The Governor, who early on won the support of Alaska liberals after she pushed through an enormous, unprecedented tax increase on the oil industry, seems to be back in their good graces with this appointment.
ADN liberal bloggers responded to Palin’s Supreme Court appointment writing,
“Ohmigawd!??The governor's been taken over by space aliens.??What an improvement!”
“Wow. Way to go Palin! I can't believe I just said that. But hey, credit where credit is due.”
“Glad to see a woman in the position to balance out the court. Good for Palin for keeping bible thumper beliefs out of the court system and honoring the separation of Church and State.”
“This is the one good action that Sarah Palin has taken over the past three years. And I have no problem admitting it. Great pick!!!! So even if the wing-nut parental consent bill passes, the state Supremes now have enough votes to overturn it as unconstitutional.”
Granted Palin would have had to put up a fight to block the appointment of the far left Christen to the court. Under Alaska law the judicial council made up mostly of liberal lawyers gets to filter out candidates who do not hold a leftist background. The governor must pick from the names forwarded.
But former governor Frank Murkowski during his term fought the process and at first refused to name any of the names submitted to him. The liberal media beat him up pretty bad over it and he eventually caved.
If Governor Palin would have taken on this fight, it probably would have ended up in court. If she had taken up the fight and asked for all the candidates’ names that applied to be forwarded, it would have brought to the public’s attention that trial lawyers control the third branch of government in Alaska. But with the governor refusing to spend any political capital on this issue, it is sure to disappear from Alaska’s political landscape.
The governor caving into trial lawyers also guarantees an activist court will continue to push its agenda on the people of Alaska. It will continue to stand between you and your child, continue to redefine marriage and block development.
Palin appointing Christen kills any move by the legislature to pass parental consent legislation. The new court with Christen on it will surely strike down any new laws. This is one of the reason Palin’s caving is confusing. Just recently held a news conference standing side by side with conservative lawmakers sponsoring new parental consent legislation.
Refusing to fight for parental consent laws is risky for Palin. It clearly will help her avoid controversy from the liberal media. But conservatives supporting her won't like the fact she appointed a former Planned Parenthood board member to Alaska’s highest court.
Many of the governor’s conservative supporters have ignored her high taxes and liberal anti free market policies. They support her simply because she says she is pro-life and is open about her faith. But the Christen appointment proves that while the governor lives the pro-life message in her personal life, she is not willing to spend political capital on the issue in her political life.
wait what
They get embarrassed and still have to make the same choice they were stuck with in the first place.
Good point. Very good point.
Still challenging your original premise, did or does Palin know that Christen is pro-abortion. The group was not planned parenthood at the time, they didn’t promote abortions at the time, the application linked above makes no mention of it.
You are accusing Palin of nominating a pro-abortion candidate when we DON’T KNOW that Christen is pro-abortion. You are making the assumption based on what the MSM says. You should know better.
Again, the more important question- Why is this Alaskan’s for Life promoting the more liberal, pro-abortion Smith? Don’t you think that question raises red flags about their charge?
What other unalienable rights do you want to let the states decide?
why do they have to make the choice after they’ve been “embarrassed”
If they refused once - they can refuse twice - heck 3 or 4 times.
What are they going to do?
Can they impeach her?
“what happens to her if she refuses the choices offered to her?”
The exact same thing that happened the last time an Alaskan Governor tried to reject the choice offered. They send back the exact same choice and say choose one!
Look it will take a more credible story than this to send Sarah to the sidelines permanently.
In addition again the MSM will assert until they are blue in the face that Sarah is pro-life.
It’s a good post - I’ll delay my abandonment for now.
But if it turns out she appointed a pro-deather, I’m out.
So make your case for her only other choice which was Eric Smith.
Give us your sales points on him and why he was a better choice.
Your credibility is suffering a body blow on this thread, I hope that your presentation on him is good.
“The exact same thing that happened the last time an Alaskan Governor tried to reject the choice offered. They send back the exact same choice and say choose one!”
and then again - say “no”
Say NO as many times as it takes.
OK, let me make sure ive got this. You oppose Sarah,, because,,,she is,,an Abortionist? Got it.
I already addressed that. Leave the post vacant until they provide a candidate who lives up to her sworn oath to protect unalienable rights.
>> >> Not killing your child is not a pro-life credential.
>> wait what
On it’s own, that’s technically correct. Do Pro-Choice families have children?
BTW, this is NOT a comment about Palin!
Well, strictly speaking, Yes, it is precisely one of the credentials.
Well, since Hillary Clinton didn't kill Chelsea, I guess she's "pro-life" then. /s
EV, do you KNOW what the Missouri plan is ? A Governor has no choice but to select liberal #1 or liberal #2. Neither of these people would’ve been appointed if she was given a free hand. A Governor has a gun pointed to their head with this disgusting liberal-protection judicial selection method. It’s the same in my state and we’re fighting to get rid of it.
She could be impeached for violation of the state Constitution, yes, where it says that "The governor shall fill any vacancy in an office of supreme court justice or superior court judge by appointing one of two or more persons nominated by the judicial council."
The key word there is "shall", which imposes a legal requirement. It does not offer her a legal option beyond that listed.
Those who suggest that she refuse to appoint either are both advocating civil disobedience and politically ignorant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.