Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
getting a plethora of ignorant petty comments that do nothing to dispell anything brought up in the article

Why bother actually reading the article? Evolution, and scientific theories like it, are not falsifiable, any more than the existence of God is, thus, how can it be science? We have never observed the development of a new genus in the laboratory, even after 1000's of generations: E.Coli is still E.Coli and fruit flies are still fruit flies. The theory, then, must be flexible, like a reed in the wind, to adapt to any new developments and data that falsifies previously held notions. It is constantly revised, updated and enhanced, for this is the very nature of "science". It's supreme flexibility to acommodate any new data is it's greatest advantage, hence the ToE evolves!

As such, the theory will never die, but is with us until The Day, when it's absurdity will be made obvious when the Rider splits the clouds!

45 posted on 03/06/2009 10:34:26 AM PST by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: jimmyray

[[As such, the theory will never die, but is with us until The Day, when it’s absurdity will be made obvious when the Rider splits the clouds!]]

Yup- a day I wait anxiously for- The look on their faces will be something to behold as they exclaim “But, but, bacteria developed a resistance to antibiotics, and some even ‘evolved’ the ability to digest 2% of nylon (Something the evolutionists NEVER disclose when they claim Bacteria ‘evolved’ the ability to ‘digest nylon-’- the ONLY thing they are digesting are the elements in nylon that are EXACTLY like their previous food sources structurally- somehting evos keep hidden from hte public)- Oh and let’s not forget their ‘best ‘established’ evidence to date- the evolution of hearing in land animals- another hting they keep hidden is the FACT that the skulls which supposedly show a ‘neat’ little evolutionary line are infact drawn the same size BUT this is intentional deceit on their part because the water creature is hte size of a rat while the land creature the skull is drawn the same size of, and for which evos claim is the ‘closest relative’ of hte water creature is the SIZE OF A HIPPO! Where are all the ‘transitions’ and billions of morphological evolutionary changes between those two creatures? MISSING of course- but their ‘neat little chart’ intentionally deceives the public by inferring that the creatures were the same size- So much for their ‘best evidentiary case’ for evolution from water to land creatures and hearing bones!


82 posted on 03/06/2009 1:56:47 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson