Centurion2000 wrote:
“Oh, people are betting on [ban and confiscation]. Compliance on the other hand .... that’s a whole other kettle of fish entirely.”
You bet. WHEN the gun-grabbers come to my house, I’ll tell them I don’t have any. By the time they have a search warrant, they’ll really be “gone”, as will I and my family. They’ll have to dig up the stinking National Forest to find them.
On the other hand, I will tell them I have weapons and I will die rather than give them up. There will be at least one fewer to go to your house, even if you have already gone to the woods. I expect my wife will get one or two more of the goons, too. Heck, if I am lucky our dog will piss on their truck tires. We may die but we are not going peacefully. Death to tyrants. Is that clear enough?
I can't believe how people think it's going to happen in such an open way.
It won't, just like the 'Fainess Doctrine' won't occur with a full frontal assault.
It will be a series of small battles, no one of which will (in and of itself) be much of a threat.
Odds are greater than 10,000:1 that anyone will satisfaction of directly facing down anyone there to physically take the weapons. Our enemies are far too clever.
Sorry, by the time they get to this point search warrants will be replaced with writs of assistance. Make no mistake about it, if they are ready to dispatch the 2nd with no respect, they WILL NOT bother respecting the 4th.