You really shouldn't discuss accuracy when you can't pull it off yourself. I never referred to allegory as fairy tale. I referred to allegory and to fairy tale, but did not equate them.
Actually, you are. If the bible were literally inerrant, it would have been much more precise in calculating the value of the ratio, or, more likely, would have remained silent on the matter.
Really, if the text said "the vessel was 3 and one-tenth cubits in diameter" you wouldn't be asking people "Does pi=3.1?" If it said "the vessel was 3 and three-twentieths cubits in diameter you wouldn't be asking people "Does pi=3.15?"
Sure you would. Just as surely as a cubit is a micrometer.
“I never referred to allegory as fairy tale.”
Yes, you did. My posts have all referred to allegory. The word “allegory” is routinely replaced by respondants by “lie” or some other equally inaccurate representation of my point—”fairy tale” in this case.
How can you adhere to the literal inerrancy of the bible if you can’t even demonstrate the “literal inerrancy” of your own posts?