[atlaw]

The "burden of proof" falls to those making the claim that it does.

"That it does" is the inquiry of evolutionary biology. That inquiry has led, by way of small example, to the more than 112,000 articles available in this free archive.

In turn, Ms. Boop has posited "that it doesn't." Some explanation beyond taking-the-fifth seems in order.

[atlaw]

Oops. See above.

[betty boop]

Found you!!!

Oh my. You said all this without even letting me know....

No problem, friend. I'll just go look at your link and get back to you. Okay?

[betty boop]

Have been to your cite.

What is it about you "Darwinists?" You cannot articulate a single thought about what you actually "believe": but instead present us with an astronomical list of pings, unsorted according to any useful or meaningful criterion.

At the end of the day, I have absolutely no idea what YOU think or believe. I just have your "approved list." Plus the understanding that it's up to me to figure out what your point is. You don't have to do anything but put up a ping list.

Thanks a lot. Please, if you want to have an actual rational conversation with another intelligent human being, I really do think you need to "clean up your act" first.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you for your reply and the link - but again I must aver that there is nothing in the [microbiologists'] laboratory experiments to falsify any other explanation for what the paleontologist observes in his digs.

The bottom line is that nothing discovered in the laboratory can falsify either special creation or panspermia.