Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats to win in 2010? (Vanity)
(Vanity)

Posted on 03/04/2009 9:41:28 AM PST by nosofar

Democrats are taking a gamble. It's still almost two years until the next election. This is plenty of time to come out of recession. I remain optimistic that this will be the case. By the obscene spending now, Democrats achieve a few things. They reward consituencies, increase dependency on government, and consolidate their own political power, all while blaming everything on Bush and Republicans. If they had waited for a few months to do this, they would be taking more of the blame. They'll get away with it, too. Conservatives are helping out by lowering expectations with every hysterical cry that we are heading into a depression or worse. This may or may not be true. If it isn't, all that is accomplished is that the bar will be set lower. If we *don't* go into a depression, Democrats will claim that as success and be vindicated that the massive spending spree is what brought us out (not in spite of it). By the time the next elections roll around, we will probably be out of the recession. People will have forgiven or forgotten the spending binge. The majority of the populace are rather ignorant economically and enough will accept the idea that spending like a drunken sailor is a good thing that this will be come public policy for the future. In 2010, Obama will be re-elected and Democrats will retain control of both houses and Pseudo-Keynesian 'economics' (lipstick included) will become the policy for the next decade.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: nosofar
No, it won't work. There are two reasons, one based on fundamentals, the other based on technical considerations:

The fundamentals strongly argue that things will be much worse in 2010—precisely because of the horribly wrong policy actions the collectivists have decided to take.

Technically, the downmove since the fall of 2007 is clearly an impulsive move. It is also quite clearly the first downmove, and so must be followed by a corrective rally of some sort. But then there must be at least one more impulsive downmove, to new lows. There is no more reliable pattern in technical analysis. And the structure of the price charts could not be clearer. You can take this forecast to the bank. I'll even tell you that the bottom of the first downmove is only weeks away-perhaps even only days away. The spring Equininox is a highly likely target date for the bottom. Just be aware that the rally that follows won't reach new highs, and won't last more than a year or so (and most probably somewhat less.)

21 posted on 03/04/2009 10:08:20 AM PST by sourcery (Obama Lied. The Economy Died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nosofar
Democrats will win second place in 2010 is all, Losers the lot of them.
22 posted on 03/04/2009 10:17:01 AM PST by Cheetahcat (Osamabama the Wright kind of Racist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nosofar
So you think things will "get better on their own" and that nothing Zero can do will make things worse? Then you should buy GM, it is a bargain. I suspected as much. So you will say this but you don't actually believe it.

Μολὼν λάβε

23 posted on 03/04/2009 10:28:46 AM PST by wastoute (translation of tag "Come and get them (bastards)" and the Scout Motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nosofar

Correction...

“It’s 21 months until the next election...”


24 posted on 03/04/2009 10:29:12 AM PST by proudpapa (Obama - The Worst One Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree
a sitting congresscritter has the edge over an incumbent.

Say what?

25 posted on 03/04/2009 11:38:54 AM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

In politics (I’ve worked on a number of campaigns so I’m not talking just to hear my head roar), an incumbent always has an edge or a step ahead of a challenger. The challenger must work doubly hard to overcome that edge.


26 posted on 03/04/2009 12:32:51 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

I realize that, but a “sitting” congressperson and an incumbent are the same thing - at least that’s my interpretation. I think you meant incumbent vs. challenger?


27 posted on 03/04/2009 2:49:15 PM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out
I'm not sure it will be a distance memory this time around. Americans will
learn a valuable lesson about consequences of their votes.
They all bought into the Bush bashing and voted strait RAT.
Maybe this time they'll pay attention to their candidates more closely.
28 posted on 03/04/2009 2:52:06 PM PST by MaxMax (RINO=RAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

Sorry. My brain outpacing my typing skills again. :)


29 posted on 03/04/2009 6:30:53 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson