Skip to comments.
Democrats to win in 2010? (Vanity)
(Vanity)
Posted on 03/04/2009 9:41:28 AM PST by nosofar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: nosofar
No, it won't work. There are two reasons, one based on fundamentals, the other based on technical considerations:
The fundamentals strongly argue that things will be much worse in 2010—precisely because of the horribly wrong policy actions the collectivists have decided to take.
Technically, the downmove since the fall of 2007 is clearly an impulsive move. It is also quite clearly the first downmove, and so must be followed by a corrective rally of some sort. But then there must be at least one more impulsive downmove, to new lows. There is no more reliable pattern in technical analysis. And the structure of the price charts could not be clearer. You can take this forecast to the bank. I'll even tell you that the bottom of the first downmove is only weeks away-perhaps even only days away. The spring Equininox is a highly likely target date for the bottom. Just be aware that the rally that follows won't reach new highs, and won't last more than a year or so (and most probably somewhat less.)
21
posted on
03/04/2009 10:08:20 AM PST
by
sourcery
(Obama Lied. The Economy Died!)
To: nosofar
Democrats will win second place in 2010 is all, Losers the lot of them.
22
posted on
03/04/2009 10:17:01 AM PST
by
Cheetahcat
(Osamabama the Wright kind of Racist!)
To: nosofar
So you think things will "get better on their own" and that nothing Zero can do will make things worse? Then you should buy GM, it is a bargain. I suspected as much. So you will say this but you don't actually believe it.
Μολὼν λάβε
23
posted on
03/04/2009 10:28:46 AM PST
by
wastoute
(translation of tag "Come and get them (bastards)" and the Scout Motto)
To: nosofar
Correction...
“It’s 21 months until the next election...”
24
posted on
03/04/2009 10:29:12 AM PST
by
proudpapa
(Obama - The Worst One Ever!)
To: lilylangtree
a sitting congresscritter has the edge over an incumbent.Say what?
To: Disambiguator
In politics (I’ve worked on a number of campaigns so I’m not talking just to hear my head roar), an incumbent always has an edge or a step ahead of a challenger. The challenger must work doubly hard to overcome that edge.
26
posted on
03/04/2009 12:32:51 PM PST
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: lilylangtree
I realize that, but a “sitting” congressperson and an incumbent are the same thing - at least that’s my interpretation. I think you meant incumbent vs. challenger?
To: chuck_the_tv_out
I'm not sure it will be a distance memory this time around. Americans will
learn a valuable lesson about consequences of their votes.
They all bought into the Bush bashing and voted strait RAT.
Maybe this time they'll pay attention to their candidates more closely.
28
posted on
03/04/2009 2:52:06 PM PST
by
MaxMax
(RINO=RAT!)
To: Disambiguator
Sorry. My brain outpacing my typing skills again. :)
29
posted on
03/04/2009 6:30:53 PM PST
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson